Question 1

Is a JSON file always larger than the original CSV file?

Accepted Answer

Yes, in almost every practical scenario utilizing the standard "Array of Objects" conversion method. Because JSON requires explicit structural syntax (curly braces, brackets, colons, and double quotes) and repeats the column headers as keys for every single row, the resulting file will be significantly larger. A typical increase is between 30% and 60%. The only exception is if you convert the CSV into a JSON "Array of Arrays", which strips out the keys and results in a nearly identical file size, though it sacrifices readability.

Question 2

Can I convert a JSON file back into a CSV file?

Accepted Answer

Yes, but with significant caveats. Converting flat JSON (an array of single-level objects) back to CSV is a simple, lossless process. However, if the JSON contains deeply nested data (e.g., an object containing an array of other objects), there is no direct equivalent in a flat CSV. To convert nested JSON to CSV, you must first "flatten" the data, which often involves duplicating rows or creating complex, concatenated column headers (like user.address.street). Information regarding the hierarchical structure is inherently lost when moving from JSON back to CSV.

Question 3

How do I handle CSV files that use a semicolon instead of a comma?

Accepted Answer

Despite the name "Comma-Separated Values," many European software systems use semicolons (;) as the default delimiter because the comma is used as the decimal separator in their numeric systems (e.g., 1.000,50). Every professional conversion tool or library contains a configuration parameter (often simply called delimiter or separator) that allows you to specify exactly which character to split on. You must explicitly set this parameter to ; before running the conversion, otherwise the parser will treat the entire row as a single, massive column.

Question 4

What happens if my CSV file has missing data or empty cells?

Accepted Answer

When a tokenizer encounters two delimiters back-to-back with nothing in between (e.g., John,,Smith), it registers an empty string. During the conversion process, most standard JSON converters will output this as an empty string value ("middleName": ""). However, advanced converters allow you to configure how empty cells are handled. You can instruct the converter to output a JSON null value ("middleName": null), or you can instruct it to completely omit the key-value pair from that specific object to save space.

Question 5

Does converting CSV to JSON change the actual data?

Accepted Answer

If configured correctly, the raw information remains identical, but the data types may change depending on your settings. In a CSV, everything is text. The number 42 is the character '4' and the character '2'. If you convert without type inference, the JSON will maintain the text ("42"). If you enable type inference, the data changes from a text string to a numeric primitive (42) in the resulting JSON. The underlying meaning is the same, but how the computer's memory interacts with that data is fundamentally altered.

Question 6

Is CSV an obsolete format now that JSON is the standard for the web?

Accepted Answer

Absolutely not. CSV remains the undisputed king of human-readable data storage, flat data transfer, and spreadsheet compatibility. It is vastly superior to JSON for logging massive amounts of sequential data because it requires significantly less disk space and can be appended to line-by-line without needing to parse the entire file. JSON is the standard for application state and network transfer, but CSV remains the standard for raw data storage and business intelligence reporting. The two formats are entirely complementary, which is why the conversion process remains a permanent fixture in software engineering.

CSV to JSON Converter

Command Palette