Question 1

What happens if I make a syntax error while generating my CSP header?

Accepted Answer

If a Content Security Policy header contains a syntax error, the browser's behavior depends on the severity of the error. If a specific directive is misspelled (e.g., scipt-src instead of script-src), the browser will simply ignore that specific directive and print a warning in the developer console, falling back to the default-src rule. However, if the entire header is malformed or uses invalid delimiters, the browser may discard the entire policy, leaving the application completely unprotected. This is exactly why using an automated generator and validating the output through a linter before deployment is a mandatory practice.

Question 2

Can a Content Security Policy prevent all types of Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)?

Accepted Answer

No, a CSP cannot prevent all types of XSS, but it mitigates the vast majority of them. A strong, nonce-based CSP is highly effective at neutralizing Stored XSS and Reflected XSS, where the attacker attempts to inject new <script> tags or inline event handlers into the DOM. However, CSP is generally ineffective against certain types of DOM-based XSS, particularly if the attacker manipulates existing, trusted scripts to execute malicious logic (such as exploiting a vulnerability in a whitelisted jQuery library). Furthermore, if a developer explicitly uses the 'unsafe-inline' keyword, the CSP provides zero protection against XSS.

Question 3

Why is my CSP blocking Google Fonts or inline styles?

Accepted Answer

Browsers treat Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) with the same strict enforcement as JavaScript. If your generated policy includes default-src 'self' and lacks a specific style-src directive, the browser will block any CSS loaded from external domains, including fonts.googleapis.com. Furthermore, modern JavaScript frameworks frequently inject styles directly into the HTML using inline <style> tags or style="..." attributes. To allow this, your policy must explicitly include style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://fonts.googleapis.com. While 'unsafe-inline' is dangerous for scripts, it is generally considered an acceptable risk for stylesheets in most standard web applications.

Question 4

How do I handle third-party marketing and analytics scripts with a strict CSP?

Accepted Answer

Handling third-party scripts is the most challenging aspect of CSP generation. If you use a Strict CSP with nonces, you must dynamically attach the server-generated nonce to the third-party <script> tag in your HTML. If that third-party script then attempts to load additional scripts (which marketing tools almost always do), you must utilize the strict-dynamic keyword in your script-src directive. strict-dynamic tells the browser: "I trust this initial script because it has a valid nonce; therefore, also trust any subsequent scripts that this script dynamically generates and inserts into the page."

Question 5

What is the difference between report-uri and report-to?

Accepted Answer

Both directives are used to instruct the browser where to send JSON reports when a CSP violation occurs, but they represent different generations of the specification. report-uri is the older, Level 2 directive. It is widely supported by almost all browsers but is officially deprecated by the W3C. report-to is the newer, Level 3 directive that integrates with the browser's broader Reporting API, allowing for more efficient, batched delivery of violation reports. Because older browsers do not support report-to and some newer browsers warn about report-uri, expert generators will include both directives in the header to ensure maximum compatibility and telemetry collection.

Question 6

Does implementing a CSP impact website performance or load times?

Accepted Answer

Implementing a well-generated CSP has a negligible impact on website performance. The browser's internal security engine is highly optimized; the string matching and cryptographic hash comparisons required to evaluate CSP rules take fractions of a millisecond. In fact, a CSP can occasionally improve perceived performance. If an application is compromised and an attacker attempts to load a massive cryptocurrency mining script from an external domain, the CSP will block the network request before it even begins, saving bandwidth and CPU cycles. The only performance consideration is the minimal overhead of generating unique nonces on the server side for each request.

CSP Header Generator

Command Palette